EXP3 lumion environment link to dropbox

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ttklscedi9yfk0q/lumion%20environment.ls5?dl=0

EXP3 skechup model link to dropbox

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3yw5thg8trsmcq3/EXP3%20sketchup%20final.skp?dl=0

moving elements

a glass lifting platform that lift people to the highest floor from the ground floor

a standalone elevator that moves people from the main road of campus to the school, which reduce the walking on the bridge

marking schedules

exp3 lumion environments images

1. bird view of the school

 2.entrance of the main road in campus

3. entrance that connects to the square house

4. view from the Anzac Parade

 5.front view

6. look from the main gate of the campus

7.back view

The aim of this project is to create a school as well as a connection of each parts of campus. So my building has different branches that reach the square house, foundation school and other parts, which means function and decoration are both important. Also, the real scale and the material like concrete and glass are considered.  The plan and section are inspired by the riverside museum by Zaha Hadid, which meats the theory of architecture should be based on observation and experiences.

exp3 drafts

Vison1

Vision2

36 drawings

ONE & TWO POINT PERSPECTIVE

EXP3--mashup

Something as important as architecture cannot be founded upon arbitrary bases. We would prefer an architecture that is consistent with human feeling, and in which design decisions are based on observation and empirical verification. Ornament and function go together. There is no structure in nature that can be classified as pure ornament without function. In traditional architecture, which was more tied to nature, such a separation never existed. The bottom line is that buildings have to provide good, healthy environments for human beings, and to inflict the least possible damage to the Earth’s ecology. Note that it is only after separating what has qualities of “life” from what does not that we have a body of examples from which to extract the sought-for geometric rules.The breakdown of the human adaptation of architecture can be traced to the forced conceptual separation of ornament from function, a relatively recent occurrence in human history. It is only in 20th-century architectural discourse that people began to think of ornament as separate from function.

Levels of scale

Strong centers

Thick boundaries

Alternating repetition

Positive space

Good shape

Local symmetries

Deep interlock and ambiguity

Contrast

Gradients

Roughness

Echoes

The void

Simplicity and inner calm

Not-separateness

a set of 15 properties that all structures that we perceive to have “life” possess.

Nikos Salingaros. "Unified Architectural Theory, Chapter 13" 30 May 2015. ArchDaily. Accesed 24 Jun 2015. <http://www.archdaily.com/636876/unified-architectural-theory-chapter-13/>

Nikos Salingaros. "Unified Architectural Theory, Chapter 14" 13 Jun 2015. ArchDaily. Accesed 24 Jun 2015. <http://www.archdaily.com/642086/unified-architectural-theory-chapter-14/>

Nikos Salingaros. "Unified Architectural Theory: Chapter 11" 02 May 2015. ArchDaily. Accesed 24 Jun 2015. <http://www.archdaily.com/626429/unified-architectural-theory-chapter-11/>.